Archive for July, 2011
BYU’s Human-powered Drill Brings Clean Water to Developing Nations
A group of engineering students from Utah’s Brigham Young University have developed an inexpensive, portable, human-powered drilling rig capable of helping people in developing nations gain access to clean drinking water.
The human-powered drilling station was designed as part of a BYU “capstone” project that encourages engineering students to solve real engineering problems with real clients (in this case, the World Health Organization), with field tests of the design carried out in remote parts of Tanzania. “At the end of our trip, it was exciting,” said Nate Toone (a graduate student of engineering at BYU and one of the students involved in the build), “… we were drilling in a farm of sandy soil and 70 feet down. When we unhooked the pipes, there was a small little geyser (of water). That was evidence to us we were successful. It was the payoff moment … we had found clean water.”
BYU’s drill is powered by 4 people, and is capable of drilling wells up to 250 ft deep at a cost of just $2000 (US), compared to conventional well-diggers who charge between $10,000 and 15,000 (US) to do the same job, using petro-powered drillers, making the BYU project an emissions-free piece of tech that’s not only more environmentally responsible than the traditional alternative, but one that may also have the potential to help developing nations like Tanzania join countries like India, which plans to skip fossil fuels altogether.
You can check out the drill in action in the video, below.
Source | Photos: BYU, via LDS Church News.
Bill Clinton Urges Americans to Paint Dark Roofs White
Bill Clinton may no longer be President, but he still has plenty of ideas on how to address the fact that 14 million people are out of work across America. Newsweek recently published an article by Mr. Clinton wherein he suggested 14 different ways of increasing jobs throughout the country.
With an overall heavy emphasis on energy sector job opportunities, his eighth proposed solution was to paint the black roofs of every city across America a bright white. Painting roofs white in order to reduce energy consumption is hardly a new concept, but adding his name to the list of those who endorse the idea is sure to give it a boost.
He suggested that the work of painting the roofs would provide employment and skill training for young workers. According to Mr. Clinton, “A big percentage of the kids have been able to parlay this simple work into higher-skilled training programs or energy-related retrofit jobs. (And, believe it or not, painting the roof white can lower the electricity use by 20 percent on a hot day!)”
He’s absolutely correct about the benefits of painting black roofs white. Solar-reflective white paint deflects 90% of sunlight, contrary to the 20% reflected by a traditional black tar roof. This results in a significant temperature drop within a building, creating a reduced need for air conditioning and considerable energy savings. White roofs also reduce the “urban heat island” effect in which temperatures are higher in dense urban areas because of the number of black tar surfaces. New York City is approximately 5 degrees warmer than the surrounding suburbs as a result of this effect.
Painting dark roofs white is a simple idea with potentially huge benefits, both environmental and economical. Hats off to former President Clinton for bringing it to the attention of a wider audience.
Related Stories:
- Cheap Solar Paint Takes a Giant Step Closer to Reality
- How Obama’s Home Star “Cash for Caulkers” Program Could Green Up America’s Homes
- MIT Roof Tiles Save Energy in All Climates
(h/t to Reuters)
Photo via Walmart Stores
Solar-Powered Bike Guide Concept Has Potential {Video}
Have you ever considered visiting Seoul, South Korea? It’s a sprawling metropolis teeming with over 10 million people, the very picture of a technologically advanced, ultra-modern city. And yet, the area has been settled for over 2,000 years. As a result, there are numerous historical spots that are worthy of exploration by residents and tourists alike.
While there is the option of taking a Seoul City Bus Tour, where you hop on and off the bus at various points of interest, it would be a much more relaxing experience to explore the many parks, palaces, and temples by bicycle. Unfortunately, there is nothing relaxing about the idea of getting from spot to spot within Seoul on a bike. As a former resident, I can vouch for the crazy-making traffic and daredevil attitude of most drivers. I have twice been driven around by cabbies who admitted to not having their glasses with them, and it didn’t seem to bother them one bit. To venture into Seoul’s traffic on a bike is to take your life into your own hands. Add to this the fact that tourists wouldn’t really know where they’re going, and the bike option seems pure folly.
Unless you’re designer Kukil Han. He has come up with the idea of combining buses and bikes into a safe — and relatively green — package. The bus, which has a solar-power roof, takes bicycles and riders from point to point, eliminating the need for individuals to navigate traffic. That is the basic idea, but there are great little details worked in that make it even better.
Riders would sign up for a tour at one of the many kiosks set up around the city. At these locations, there would be information about each tour, and riders could use a touch-screen display to check on times and pre-pay for the service. While inside the bus, passengers watch television screens showing information about the upcoming location. After they disembark with their bicycle, a screen mounted on the handlebars of the bike displays the same information, as well as GPS navigation, historical facts, and more. Riders are also notified via the screen when it’s time to return to the bus.
Bike Guide from Kukil Han
There’s a lot of potential in this idea, particularly for exploring places within large cities that might otherwise be daunting for the average tourist to navigate to on their own. After all, it’s one thing to rent a bike in Paris, and quite another to know where to go with it and to not exhaust your body and patience in the process.
Will the bus/bike hybrid catch on? Seoul might be just the proving ground it needs.
Related Stories:
- Korea to Abandon Printed Textbooks by 2015
- South Korea Plans to Create 1.5 Million from Clean, Green Energy by 2030
- Inspire Software Propels City Bike-Sharing Programs
Photo via Kent Kanouse
Cooperative South Dakota Wind Farm Nets 600 Local Owners
With the right renewable energy policy, hundreds of individuals can have a stake in a renewable energy future. That’s what happened with a cooperatively-owned wind project in South Dakota, where 7 turbines from a larger wind project are shared by over 600 local investors.
The largest barrier to community ownership of renewable energy has been the use of tax credits as the primary federal incentive for renewable energy. Tax credit incentives stymie cities, counties, and cooperatives from constructing and owning their own wind farm because they are tax exempt. But the temporary cash grant in lieu of the federal tax credit (expiring this December) has opened the door, and one South Dakota wind project has used the cash grant to become the largest cooperatively-owned wind project in the U.S.:
The Crow Lake Wind Project, built by electric cooperative Basin Electric subsidiary PrairieWinds SD 1, Inc., is located just east of Chamberlain, S.D. With 150 MW of the project’s 162 MW owned by Basin Electric subsidiary PrairieWinds SD1, Inc., the facility has taken over the title of being the largest wind project in the U.S. owned solely by a cooperative, according to Basin Electric. [emphasis added]
The project is also distinguished for having local investors in addition to ownership by the local cooperative:
The entire project consists of 108 GE 1.5-MW turbines, 100 of which are owned and operated by PrairieWinds. A group of local community investors called the South Dakota Wind Partners owns seven of the turbines, and one turbine has been sold to the Mitchell Technical Institute (MTI), to be used as part of the school’s wind turbine technology program, which launched in 2009. PrairieWinds, which constructed the seven turbines now owned by the South Dakota Wind Partners, will also operate them. [emphasis added]
The key to success was the limited-time opportunity for the cooperative to access the federal incentive for wind power:
The opportunity became viable following passage of 2009’s American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, which created a tax grant option allowing small investors to access government incentives and tax benefits, making public wind ownership possible. Creating the Wind Partners for that purpose were Basin Electric member East River Electric Power Cooperative, the South Dakota Farm Bureau Federation, the South Dakota Farmers Union and the South Dakota Corn Utilization Council…
“This development model created opportunity for small local investors to have direct local ownership in wind energy and access the tax benefits previously reserved for large equity investors,” said Jeff Nelson, general manager at East River Electric. “It offers a model for others to participate in community-based wind projects.”
The South Dakota Wind Partners consist of over 600 South Dakota investors, some who host the project’s 7 turbines and many who do not. Investors bought shares in increments of $15,000 (combinations of debt and equity). Brian Minish, who manages the project for the South Dakota Wind Partners, hopes to see future opportunities for this kind of development. “There’s a lot of political benefit in letting local people become investors in the project,” Minish said in an interview last month , “local ownership can help reduce opposition to wind power projects.”
Ownership also leads to significantly higher local economic benefits. It’s a big difference from a small change in federal policy.
This post originally appeared on Energy Self-Reliant States, a resource of the Institute for Local Self-Reliance’s New Rules Project.
Photo via tinney
1,000 Induction Street Lights for the City of Tempe

After deciding that LED-based solid-state lighting (SSL) was not a good match for extreme desert temperatures, the city of Tempe, Arizona has decided to install 1,000 induction street lights to launch phase one of a street-light-retrofit initiative.
“After evaluating the two leading street lighting platforms of induction and light emitting diode, or LED, Tempe ruled out LED for its high equipment cost and performance volatility in the temperature extremes of the southern Arizona environment.”
The city of Columbus, Ohio reported similar issues of street light failure within two months of LED installation. However, the problems that occurred as a result of this installation were not specifically linked to LED or induction lights and most other municipalities and utilities have had a positive experience with LED and induction lighting, which, generally, has produced 20% in energy savings. For instance, a retrofit initiative in Dublin, Ohio of 1,500 street lights with LED-based lights reduced energy by 40-50% and cut costs by $500,000.
Although it remains unclear as to whether or not the performance of LED-based lights are actually affected by desert southwest climates, the lower initial costs of induction lighting certainly make them a more attractive option for replacing the current high-pressure-sodium (HPS) and metal-halide (MH) street light sources. Most importantly, this retrofit will reduce the energy required to power the lights by as much as 40% and offer increased energy savings for the city of Tempe.
Photo courtesy of Tempe.gov
Related Articles:
- Clean Technology Venture Investments Down 33%, but Bright Future Expected
- Cost Savings Remain Driving Factor Behind Commercial Retrofits
- Broken-Hearted Lawmakers Just Can’t Quit Incandescent Light Bulbs
- Sears Canada Bans Inefficient Lighting, Moves to LEDs



